Singapore Entrepreneurs Network & Startup Organization

you are too involved to the dark side of the force.

hehe

Thats a nice sounding quote. I bet the quotes i posted sounded nice too to the people back then.



didn't you always promote the "there is no right no wrong" and "there is no one solution that fits all people" line of reasoning? but here you are trying to categories people in two groups. lol.

according to the field of psychology there are 5 personality traits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_five_personality_traits



Me and the people I know are successful today because we know and avoided the teachings of charlatans. So why should we change and give up our success?

I'm trying to spread success + happiness the only way I know: revealing the secrets of success!



The Dark side of the Force is the pathway to many abilities which some might consider....unnatural.  

Thanks for giving me something to post when senso forumer try to worm his way out using the "no right no wrong" argument.

So you also agree there is a yes and no regarding whether the teachings of Adam Khoo, Clemen Chiang, Tony Buzan or Robert Kiysoaki works or not?

And after giving u the wrong fact that we only use 10% of our brain and that his teachings can help u use more %, you still choose to think Tony Buzan's teachings work?



Hmmm...i think u are the one who need to do some research on "NLP". Heres a convinent little page with lots of referral links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming

You might find out that NLP isn't even mainstream psychology nor is it scientifically proven.  Funny why u choose to pay them money without doing any due dilligence on ur own.



Hmmm...this isn't even about gurus. i think u getting too sensitive lol. this is about rich and powerful or influential people making dumb statements in history. it'll be interesting to see which great and correct sounding quote today will become the dumb statement of tomorrow.

Regardless of how much hype "gurus" generates, what I know is this: I got success by hardwork and not paying gurus. And I have and will continue to empower others to achieve success by seeing thru charlatans.

So many others have succeeded when they're willing to put in hard work and stop looking for "get rich quick" or "get successful quick" shortcuts, I don't see why we shouldn't do the same!



oh don't worry. i never took gurus or their blind worshippers seriously.

LOL

Unfortunately most of the local self-style own named "gurus" are blowing a full bucket of hot-air, more hype than truth. More misleading people than empowering people.

The worst thing is most kids, and young adults are poisoned by them, going for an elusive "dream"

While a lot of things have a "right" or "wrong", a lot of things doesn't. Its funny u are against this concept of fuzziness since your favourite guru Tony Buzan used it to support his "10% brain" theory which has been proven wrong by neuro scientists a long time ago.

Do you know that the word "Male" and "Female" itself is relative? If the person who invented it switch the meanings then we'll be calling guys "female" today. Do you know there are people with no gender or both? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersexual)
Likewise to an alien, Tommyshi would be an alien. By human standards, Tommyshi would be a human being. So IS Tommyshi and alien or human?



Same reasoning...how exactly do u classifly "matchers" and "mis-mismatchers"? What if this person look "towards congruency" 50% of the time and see how it won't work out the other 50% of the time?

Your guru might tell you "well, if he look towards congruency most of the time then he is a matcher". But what exactly does "most" mean? Does 51% count? What about 60% of the time?

Then what about people with no opinion? They don't look twards congruency nor do they bother to see how it won't work out? People who are neutral? What if they're neutral 30% of the time and not during the other 70%?

For matchers, they "see things as it is". What if the thing in question is a scam? By seeing it as a scam they "see things as it is" yet by admitting that it is a scam they "see how it won't work out". So what do they fall under?

How do they know for sure "mis-matchers" are not better off? Did they do a study on the success rate of "matchers" and "mis-matchers"? What are the stats like?

Ultimately the important question here is: Did you bother to find out? Did you bother to actually READ their "research" or you just happily pay up?

LOL. Coming to think of it, I only attended 1 training programme in my whole entire life - Adam Khoo's.

(After that, all I did was coach for AK and did massive readup on personal development... other than that, I attended small cheap-skate seminars which I initially thought was good but it sucked!)



I don't know about you. But maybe because of this powerful experience that I saw a GURU as a COACH. Therefore, it all lies in whether you have the guts to invest in a COACH or by your judgement if you think the coach  is credible!

BTW Tommyshi, look up on DR GEORGI LOZANOV. He is a professor specializing on the relation of medicine and education cum the founder of accelerated learning. Without him, no Buzan, no AK!